I have always thought that communication programs in various colleges have differences. For example, communication arts tend to be more dynamic; mass communication always has everyone as its intended audience; development communication – the school of thought where I belong – delves in the nitty-gritty of the communication process.
So, I did not exactly know what to expect when I was about to attend De La Salle University’s Student Media Congress which happened last July 25-26. Their theme, Empowering Media Catalysts, sounded very devcom, since it has been my belief since entering college – and devcom, in particular – that media practitioners and communicators indeed catalyze change – whether individual, behavioral, or social change.
In the congress, I tried to absorb everything that I learned and mix it with what I know from my development communication learning to make a hodge-podge idea of making communicators as catalysts. This piece is an attempt to synthesize bits of development communication we are taught in college and the things I have learned from SMC.
But first: Where I am coming from
The development communication school of thought and the schools of thought in other communication courses have a couple of differences. For example, as argued by development communication veterans Dr. Alexander Flor and the late Prof. Ivy Ongkiko in our introductory textbook Introduction to Development Communication, “[masscom] is media-centric and source-oriented while dev com is message-centric and receiver-oriented.” They also said that devcom tend to have smaller, more tightly-knit audiences than masscom (thus, the term mass in masscom.) The same book also says that communication arts “aims to accentuate man” while devcom “educates man.”
Development communication, we are taught, is always about the people: their information needs, capacity, and the uses of appropriate media for communicating relevant information that shall help their lives. As we would say in devcom’s subfield of community/development broadcasting, “know your audience.”
So, where do they meet?
This year’s SMC theme is Empowering Media Catalysts. Catalysts, scientifically speaking, help in making a new product from a chemical reaction. The congress reminded us, communication people, to listen to the audience, remain relevant, and uphold the Filipino spirit.
Relevance. Manila Broadcasting Company’s Santi Elizalde presented to the delegates the station-listener-station approach; broadcasters should know what the audience wants, what they talk about, how they speak, in order to get in touch and remain relevant to their listeners. The Philippine Star’s Mick Atienza, discussing print media, showed that newspaper as a form of news media can still catch up by utilizing various technologies. These are paradigms about maintaining relevance of their respective media.
Listening. As stated earlier, MBC’s Elizalde takes into paramount importance audience interaction. ABS-CBN’s Carlos Rodriguez, meanwhile, said that ABS-CBN gets to know the immediate audience reactions through “addressing the second screen.”
Upholding the Filipino. The first keynote speaker, the BBC’s Rico Hizon, reminded delegates that as Filipinos, we have the responsibility to make our existence count. The integrity of the Filipino is in everyone’s hands. He also reminded students of media that “we can be world-class.” GMA News’ Howie Severino, meanwhile, asserted that today’s generation – our generation – is the “most empowered generation in history,” as we have control of the information we handle, receive, and disseminate.
Youth, Social Change, and TV. While I have attended four workshops – all about broadcasting – on the second day, one workshop struck me the most as a development communicator-in-the-making: Youth as Catalysts for Social Change through Television, which was led by state network PTV-4’s Robert Tan.
His lecture centered on having a clear plan of making things for the better – from identifying issues to having “definiteness of purpose” to the actual planning stages. However, what struck me the most are these three words: Engage, Inspire, Motivate.
In development communication, we are always taught about how important the information receivers are. But, as communicators, we can do much more than knowing audience needs then addressing them. Those three words should indeed be our aim as communicators, no matter what school of thought we belong to: motivate and engage people to work on their problems.
***
Indeed, empowering people through communication is not exclusive to one communication field or school of thought. It is something that EVERY communication practitioner should be able to do. This year’s Student Media Congress reminds me of my core function not just as a development communicator, but generally as a communicator: we can spark change.
Being part of the change, we must remain relevant, in spite of the overflow of information surrounding every Filipino. We must know what the audience wants, and, most importantly, needs; information needs should be prioritized. We have the power to address issues. In our own little ways, we can raise awareness and spark change.
Those are big words, indeed. But there will come a time when we will be able to make these ideas concrete.
The synthesis boils down to this: Addressing what the people need is where development communication and other communication schools of thought meet.